Browsing by Author "SOUZA, Alef Pires de"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Parecer Jurídico
    (Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2022-11-30) SOUZA, Alef Pires de; GIMENEZ, Márcio Vinícius Galliego; ROBERTO, Rodrigo de Oliveira; CABRAL, Ildelisa; SILVA, Rosana Ribeiro da; ZAPPIA, Juliano Vieira; PALOMO, João Fernando Alves; CAMBAÚVA, Rafael Bragagnole
    This is a query formulated by Maria Marta about doubts referring to a divorce process combined with maintenance and doubt about your conduct.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Parecer Jurídico
    (Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2022-11-30) SOUZA, Alef Pires de; GIMENEZ, Márcio Vinícius Galliego; ROBERTO, Rodrigo de Oliveira; CABRAL, Ildelisa; SILVA, Rosana Ribeiro da; ZAPPIA, Juliano Vieira; PALOMO, João Fernando Alves; CAMBAÚVA, Rafael Bragagnole
    This is a query made by Maria Marta regarding doubts regarding a divorce process involving the determination of alimony and doubts about her conduct.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Providências Jurídicas: Direito Previdenciário
    (Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2023-11-30) SOUZA, Alef Pires de; BALDASSI, Izadora Aparecida Moreira; CUSENTINE, Jackeline Ferreira; SANTOS, Lais Emanuelle dos; PEREIRA, Maria Fernanda Dias; SANTICHIOLLI, Mylena Simioni; CAMBAÚVA, Rafael Bragagnole; BORSARI, Juliana Marques; LIMA, Daniele Arcolini C. de; NICOLA, Fabricio Silva
    The Plaintiff lived for approximately six months in a stable union with Mr. PAULO NOBRE, a Brazilian, single, factory toolmaker. However, on August 2, 2023, as a result of a work accident, Paulo died, leaving the Plaintiff as his only dependent. This fact led the Plaintiff to contact the Defendant, claiming the Survivor's Pension Benefit, through a protocol with the Social Security Authority. However, on August 29, 2023, the Plaintiff was informed that her request, NB 123.456.789-0, had been denied. This denial is due to the argument that her condition as a dependent of the deceased was not demonstrated, since they had lived together for a period of less than two years, a fact that did not grant the Plaintiff the right to the survivor's pension.