Browsing by Author "PERINOTTO, Vitória Munhoz"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Defesa Administrativa: Direito Internacional
(Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2023-06-30) FONSECA, Rafaella José; SOUZA, Roberta Nussa de; PERINOTTO, Vitória Munhoz; CAMBAÚVA, Rafael Bragagnole; BORSARI, Juliana Marques; LIMA, Daniele Arcolini C. de; NICOLA, Fabricio Silva
As determined by art. 309, § 4° of Decree 9.199 of 2017, after the infraction report has been drawn up, the offender will be notified to present a defense within ten days. Furthermore, if the offender does not present a defense within the established period, he/she will be considered in default.
Parecer Jurídico
(Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2022-11-30) FONSECA, Raffaela José; SOUZA, Roberta Mussa de; PERINOTTO, Vitória Munhoz; SILVA, Rosana Ribeiro da; SANSEVERINO, Cyro Gilberto Nogueira; ZAPPIA, Juliano Vieira; FARIA, Luiz Francisco Soeiro de; PALOMO, João Fernando Alves; SILVA, Wiliam Cardozo
It is a query formulated by the consultant Márcio Dias, about the possibility of eligibility for Federal Deputy for the state of São Paulo, denied by the party whose allegation was the kinship with the then governor of the state. There is also doubt about the obligation to give personal testimony in court in person. And also, the possibility of the consultant responding with his own assets for the default of the same legal entity, and finally, the possibility of defense for criminal offense where the consultant claims ignorance of the law.
Parecer Jurídico
(Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2022-11-30) FONSECA, Rafaella José; SOUZA, Roberta Nussa de; PERINOTTO, Vitória Munhoz; SILVA, Rosana Ribeiro da; SANSEVERINO, Cyro Gilberto Nogueira; ZAPPIA, Juliano Vieira; PALOMO, João Fernando Alves; FARIA, Luiz Francisco Soeiro de; SILVA, William Cardozo
This is a query made by consultant Márcio Dias, about the possibility of eligibility for Federal Deputy for the state of São Paulo, denied by the party whose claim was kinship with the then governor of the state. There is also doubt about the obligation to give personal testimony in court in person. And also, the possibility of the consultant being liable with his own assets for the default of the same legal entity, and finally, the possibility of defense for criminal offense where the consultant claims ignorance of the law.
Relatório Técnico Diagnóstico
(Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2023-11-30) FONSECA, Rafaella José; SOUZA, Roberta Nussa de; PERINOTTO, Vitória Munhoz; SILVA, William Cardozo; NICOLA, Fabricio Silva; BORSARI, Juliana Marques
José sold a car to his neighbors Diego and Ana, who are married under a universal property regime. The couple acquired the vehicle through a purchase and sale agreement for R$100,000.00, payable in 20 monthly installments of R$5,000.00. They were able to pay the vehicle on time up until the 17th installment, but were in default on the last three. In view of the above, Mr. José filed a lawsuit to terminate the contract, and the couple was served with a summons. Upon reading the initial petition, they observed that the requests were for the termination of the contract, the return of the vehicle, the conviction of Diego and Ana to pay a fine of 70% and also the search and seizure, and also the application of clause 13 of the contract, which stated: “In the event of unjustified non-payment of any of the 20 (twenty) monthly installments of R$5,000.00, the contract will be terminated, the vehicle must be returned to the seller, and the installments not yet paid will be due in advance and a fine of 70% (seventy percent) will be applied to this amount, due to the seller.”