Browsing by Author "Facco, Lucilla Pires Ribeiro"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Parecer Jurídico
    (Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2019-11-30) Facco, Lucilla Pires Ribeiro; Mucin, Samuel de Paiva; Bettio, Stefani de Oliveira; Cabral, Ildelisa; Zappia, Juliano Vieira; Borsari, Juliana Marques; Palomo, João Fernando Alves; Silva, Rosana Ribeiro da
    This is a query made by Caio on the admissibility whether or not to practice vaquejada after modifying the Federal Constitution; as well as the assessment of the conduct adopted by Procon; the possibility of resolution through arbitration in the conflict with the car rental company and the duty or not to indemnify it; and the analysis of favoring or not favoring the application of law No. 13,546 / 2017 in the face of Sergio. The consultant informs that he was a cowboy, in order to participate in tournaments of vaquejada in the city of Ceará and that later this type of act was judged unconstitutional. With few employment options, it was decided to move to the State Capital, assuming the position of application driver.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Parecer Jurídico
    (Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos, 2019-11-30) Facco, Lucilla Pires Ribeiro; Mucin, Samuel de Paiva; Bettio, Stefani de Oliveira; Cabral, Ildelisa; Zappia, Juliano Vieira; Borsari, Juliana Marques; Palomo, João Fernando Alves; Silva, Rosana Ribeiro da
    This is a query formulated by Caio. It questions whether there is a possibility of the Federal Supreme Court again prohibiting the practice of vaquejada, even though the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) was approved, which amended the Federal Constitution to allow the referred practice in the sporting and cultural modality; It inquires if the PROCON of Fortaleza-CE acted correctly when denying service to it, claiming that it was not the consumer consultant in the relationship maintained with a car rental company; Requests clarification on the arbitration process and whether this technique can be applied to resolve the conflict that arose between the consultant and the vehicle rental company, as well as whether the latter must indemnify the latter in relation to damages suffered to the leased vehicle after involvement in a traffic accident; Finally, it asks if Law 13.546/2017 affects the process in which Sérgio (causer of the traffic accident in which the consultant was involved), is responsible for the murder committed against Cíntia, helping or harming the defendant.